Entry and exit frameworks for futures traders
A repeatable entry framework combines three checks: a technical trigger, a risk-defined position size, and a funding rate context check. The first two are hard requirements. The third is contextual input.
Your exit is defined when you open the position, not after the market starts moving. A take-profit and stop-loss set as conditional orders before entry removes the in-trade decision.
Aim for a minimum 1:1.5 reward-to-risk ratio: for every unit of risk, target at least 1.5 units of reward. A ratio below 1:1 means you need to be right more often than you're wrong to come out ahead.
Never move your stop-loss further away after opening a trade. Moving it further out is choosing to take a larger loss if the trade continues to go wrong.
The three most common framework failures are entering without a trigger, moving the stop, and closing the take-profit early. Each one maps directly to a skipped step in the entry or exit checklist.
An introduction to entry and exit frameworks
Most traders spend hours deciding when to enter a trade and about thirty seconds deciding when to exit. The exit should take more thought than the entry. A repeatable framework defines both before you open a single position.
Before working through entry and exit mechanics, read our risk management for futures article for the broader context this framework sits inside.
Why framework matters more than prediction
The goal isn't to predict market direction perfectly. A trader with a repeatable framework loses less on bad trades and holds longer on good ones. The framework doesn't remove uncertainty, it removes the decisions that happen under pressure, which is when most bad choices are made.
A defined entry trigger, a pre-set exit, and a position sized to your risk tolerance are the three things that separate a structured trade from a gamble. And remember, process quality matters more than prediction quality over a large sample of trades.

Building an entry framework: the three-part check
A common approach used by structured futures traders is a three-part check before every entry.
1. Technical trigger
Price has broken a key level, an RSI has crossed a defined threshold, or another observable signal you use consistently. The trigger must be specific. Unfortunately, "The chart looks good" is not a trigger. Whereas, "Price has closed above the 4h resistance at $64,200 on volume above the 20-period average" is a trigger. If you can't write the trigger down in one sentence before you enter, you don't have one.
2. Risk-defined sizing
Before entering, calculate your position size so that if your stop-loss is hit, you lose no more than 1% to 2% of your account. This keeps any single trade from doing serious damage regardless of how confident you feel. For the full arithmetic on how to calculate this, read our dedicated position sizing with leverage article.
The relationship between position size, leverage, and risk works differently in the US vs EU and other geos. In the EU and regions outside the US, the trader picks leverage via slider, in the US it's contract-driven.
3. Funding rate context
Check whether the funding rate works for or against your intended direction. A high positive funding rate means longs are paying shorts, which is a cost for longs and a credit for shorts.
Negative funding means shorts are paying longs. This isn't a hard blocker on the trade, it's a factor that affects the effective cost of the position and your reward-to-risk ratio.
Funding settles every 8 hours in the US and every hour in the EU and other regions, so per-interval rates aren't directly comparable across locations. For context on how to read funding rates as a signal, read our full article funding rates as a strategy signal.
Checks 1 and 2 are hard requirements. Check 3 is contextual input that affects sizing and target selection.
Building an exit framework: pre-set before you open
Set your take-profit and stop-loss before your position opens, as conditional orders. Once the trade is open, the exits are fixed, and the market decides which one gets hit.
Take-profit (TP)
The price level at which you close for a win. A common benchmark is a minimum 1:1.5 reward-to-risk ratio: for every unit of risk you accept, target at least 1.5 units of reward. A 1:1 ratio means you need to be right more than half the time to come out ahead after costs. Set the TP at a level the market can realistically reach given the current structure, not at a level that would be ideal.
Stop-loss (SL)
The price level at which you accept the loss and close. Place the SL above your liquidation price. Never move it further away after the trade opens. If price approaches your SL, that's the SL doing what it was designed to do.
Both are set on Kraken Pro as conditional orders that apply OCO (one-cancels-other) logic: when one fills, the other cancels automatically. For full instructions on how to set these, see how to set a take-profit and stop-loss.
Partial scale-out: the planned exit variation
A standard exit closes the full position at one take-profit level. A scale-out closes part of the position at a first target and lets the rest run to a second target.
A common approach on a two-target exit: close 50% of the position at TP1, then move the stop-loss on the remaining 50% to break-even (entry price). The remaining half has no downside risk at that point. If price reaches TP2, you capture the additional move. If price reverses, the remaining half closes at break-even.
Worked example:
- Position: 1 BTC-PERP long, entry at $62,000
- SL: $60,500 (risk: $1,500)
- TP1: $65,000 (reward 1: $3,000, ratio 2:1): close 0.5 BTC here
- Move SL to $62,000 (break-even) on remaining 0.5 BTC
- TP2: $68,000 (reward 2: $6,000 on original size): close remaining 0.5 BTC here
This is a refinement of the core framework, not the default approach. A single clean exit at one level is simpler to manage and equally valid. The figures used in this example are for illustrative purposes only and do not guarantee an outcome.

Common framework failures
Three patterns consistently break the framework.
Entering without a defined technical trigger. A trade opened because "the chart looks good" or "it feels like it's about to move" has skipped the first check entirely. Without a trigger, there's no basis for the stop-loss placement or the target, because both should derive from the structure that gave you the entry signal.
Moving the stop-loss further away after the trade opens. When price approaches the stop, the most common reaction is to move it further out to avoid the loss. That's the stop doing its job, and overriding it is choosing to accept a larger loss than the one you agreed to when you entered.
Closing the take-profit early because you're in profit. Taking profit before the pre-set TP level feels safe in the moment. It's also how many traders watch the market hit their original target immediately after they closed, having captured a fraction of the available move. A pre-set TP exists to remove that in-trade decision.
Each failure is a predictable, avoidable decision that the framework was designed to prevent.
Ready to trade futures on Kraken?
Perpetual futures are derivatives contracts that allow you to speculate on the price movement of an asset, without needing to own the asset itself.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Disclaimer
The educational material on this page is for information only and does not constitute an offer to trade futures. Kraken Futures is provided by a different licensed Kraken entity depending on where you live. Derivatives are complex instruments that carry a high risk of rapid losses due to leverage. You should not risk money you cannot afford to lose. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and may change. Geographic restrictions may apply and can change without notice. Kraken products and services may not be covered by investor-compensation or deposit-protection schemes. Nothing on this page is investment, legal or tax advice. Access is subject to eligibility, local regulation and the Terms of Service for the legal entity you face.