Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 minutes to learn more.

Breakout vs MyCryptoFunding: full crypto prop firm comparison (2026)

By Kraken Learn team
8 min
29 April 2026
Key takeaways 🔑
  1. Breakout offers multiple evaluation paths, including 1-Step options with profit targets from 9% to 12%, with no consistency rules, no single-trade profit caps, and on-demand payouts in USDC. MyCryptoFunding's fees are non-refundable once the challenge begins.

  2. MyCryptoFunding offers 100x dynamic leverage (on 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations), a path to a 100% profit split, and both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations, but enforces minimum trading day requirements on funded accounts and payout timing restrictions that can slow access to earnings.

  3. Breakout enforces no concentration rule, no consistency restriction, and no add-on fees for core features like news trading or on-demand payouts. The trade-off is lower leverage (5:1 BTC/ETH, 2:1 alts) and a crypto-only asset universe.

  4. Breakout's programme runs on Kraken's exchange infrastructure, with a 4.8–4.9/5 Trustpilot rating across 860+ reviews. MyCryptoFunding is an independent firm founded in 2024 with a growing but more limited review history.


Breakout vs MyCryptoFunding comparison

Leverage, asset selection, and rule complexity vary wildly across crypto prop firms, and the combination you choose can make or break a strategy that works perfectly on paper. A firm offering 100x leverage with tight trading restrictions creates a very different experience than one offering 5x with almost no rules at all.

Breakout and MyCryptoFunding both appear on lists of the best crypto prop trading firms in 2026, but they sit at opposite ends of the leverage and rules spectrum. MCF offers 100x dynamic leverage and 940+ tradeable cryptocurrencies, forex,commodities, and indices, while Breakout keeps things deliberately conservative with 5x on BTC/ETH, 62 pairs, and a ruleset stripped down to the essentials.

This side-by-side comparison covers account sizes, evaluation models, profit splits, trading rules, payout mechanics, and the backing behind each platform.

FeatureBreakoutMyCryptoFunding (MCF)
Account sizes$5K–$200K$5K–$400K (max $400K allocation)
Evaluation model profit targets1-Step Turbo (9%), Classic (10%), Pro (12%), or 2-Step (5%+10%)1-Step (10%), 2-Step (10% Phase 1, 5% Phase 2), or Instant Funding
No time limitYesYes
Leverage5:1 BTC/ETH, 2:1 alts100x dynamic leverage (reduces with exposure)
Crypto assets62 crypto pairs940+ cryptocurrencies + forex/commodities/indices
Profit split (starting)80%80%
Profit split (maximum)90% with add-on100% after 5 payouts (5% auto-scaling)
Payout speedOn-demand, USDC ERC-20On-demand (add-on) or every 15 traded days; USDT/BTC/bank
Scaling planAvailable for consistent performersAvailable for consistent performers
News tradingAllowedAllowed
Weekend tradingAllowedAllowed (24/7 crypto market)
Consistency rulesNoneNone
Institutional backingKraken acquisition (Sept 2025)Independent — London registered (2024)
Best forClean rules + institutional trust + on-demand payoutsHigh leverage + wide altcoin selection + 100% split path

Breakout vs MyCryptoFunding: who is cheaper?

The headline fee comparison between these two firms is straightforward at the entry level, but the total cost of participation differs once you factor in payout timing, add-on requirements, and profit split paths. Here is a look at how the fee structures stack up.

FeatureBreakoutMyCryptoFunding
Challenge fee (entry)From $35 (1-Step Turbo $5K account)From $35 (2-Step $2500 account)
Profit split (starting)80%80%
Path to 100% splitNot availableAvailable after scaling
Payout speedOn-demand, USDCOn-demand (add-on) or every 15 traded days; USDT/BTC/bank
Minimum payout$50Verify current terms
Best forClean simple rules + on-demand payouts100% split path + high leverage

MyCryptoFunding's path to a 100% profit split is a differentiator compared to Breakout's maximum of 90% via an add-on. For high-volume traders who expect to reach five payouts quickly, that difference in long-run economics could be significant. However, the 15-day minimum trading requirement between payouts on funded accounts means access to earnings is slower than Breakout's on-demand model, unless you pay for the add-on.

Leverage comparison: 100x vs 5x — what it means in practice

The leverage difference between these two firms is the starkest numerical gap in this comparison, and it deserves honest context rather than a simple headline comparison.

MyCryptoFunding offers dynamic leverage up to 100x, which reduces as your exposure increases. At maximum leverage, a 1% adverse move in a crypto position results in a 100% loss of that position. In a market where BTC can move 3–5% in minutes during high-volatility sessions, 100x leverage represents a level of risk that most funded prop firms — and most institutional trading desks — do not operate at. MCF's dynamic reduction mechanism means leverage compresses as you build exposure, which provides some natural brake on catastrophic single-session losses. But the baseline ceiling is significantly higher than most other platforms in this comparison.

Breakout's leverage model is deliberately conservative: 5:1 on BTC and ETH, 2:1 on altcoins. At 5:1 on a $100K funded account, a trader controls $500K of BTC exposure. That is meaningful position size for most strategies. The lower ceiling also means a single bad trade is far less likely to breach the drawdown limit, giving traders more sessions to recover and adapt. For most disciplined traders running directional crypto day trading strategies on BTC and ETH, 5:1 is sufficient for meaningful exposure without the elevated blow-up risk.

The honest framing: high leverage is not inherently bad. For experienced traders with tightly managed risk parameters, 100x dynamic leverage provides flexibility that lower-leverage platforms cannot match. But in a crypto evaluation context, where a single breach ends the account, higher leverage compresses your margin for error significantly.

MyCryptoFunding rules: what to watch out for

MyCryptoFunding's rules are clearly published, and many traders succeed under them. But several are non-standard enough to warrant careful attention before you start a challenge.

  1. Minimum trading days on funded accounts. MyCryptoFunding requires 5 minimum days traded on evaluation tests and 15 minimum trading days between each payout on funded accounts. This means even after generating significant profits, traders must continue actively trading before they can withdraw. At Breakout, there are no minimum trading day requirements at any stage.

  2. Hedging restrictions. MyCryptoFunding does not permit hedging across multiple accounts. Traders who use hedging as part of their risk management workflow should be aware of this restriction before committing.

  3. Fees are non-refundable once the challenge has started. If you begin trading and fail, the evaluation fee is not returned. Prospective MCF traders should factor this into their cost planning.

Both firms offer evaluation paths, but the right choice also depends on which crypto trading tools and platform features your strategy depends on.

Which is better for crypto traders: Breakout or MyCryptoFunding?

  • Best for leverage: MyCryptoFunding. 100x dynamic leverage vs Breakout's 5:1 on BTC/ETH.

  • Best for altcoin and asset variety: MyCryptoFunding. 940+ cryptocurrencies plus forex, commodities, and indices vs Breakout's 62 crypto-only offering.

  • Best for path to 100% profit split: MyCryptoFunding. After 5 payouts with 5% auto-scaling per payout. Breakout's maximum is 90% via an add-on.

  • Best for institutional trust: Breakout. Kraken acquisition in September 2025 provides regulated parent company backing. MCF is an independent firm registered in London in 2024.

  • Best for payout reliability: Breakout. Consistent 4.8–4.9/5 Trustpilot rating across 860+ verified reviews. MCF has some documented payout delay reports in independent trader communities.

  • Best for clean, simple rules: Breakout. No minimum trading day requirements, no hedging restrictions, and no payout timing conditions.

  • Best for on-demand payouts: Breakout. Payouts can be requested at any time with no waiting period. MCF requires 15 minimum traded days between payouts on funded accounts, or an add-on for on-demand access.

  • Best for evaluation flexibility: Both. Breakout offers 1-Step options at three different profit targets (9%, 10%, 12%) plus a 2-Step. MCF also offers both 1-Step (10%) and 2-Step evaluations, plus an Instant Funding option.

Verdict: MyCryptoFunding is a strong fit for experienced traders who want high leverage, a broader asset universe including forex and commodities, and a genuine path to a 100% profit split. Breakout is the better choice for traders who want clean rules, institutional backing, and immediate on-demand payout access. The 15-day minimum trading requirement between payouts on MCF funded accounts and the non-refundable fee structure are the two factors most likely to be decisive for traders sitting on the fence.

Case study: the swing trader comparing both platforms

A BTC swing trader typically holds positions for two to five days, sizing into large moves around macro events. Their average winning trade generates $8,000–$15,000 profit on a $100K account. They trade approximately four to six times per month.

  • Approach with Breakout: The trader completes a 1-Step evaluation, news trading is permitted without any add-on, and their single winning trades count fully toward the profit target. No consistency rule applies. Payout can be requested on-demand as soon as profit is generated.

  • Approach with MyCryptoFunding: The trader completes a 1-Step or 2-Step evaluation. News trading is permitted. However, on funded accounts, the 15-day minimum trading requirement between payouts means the trader must continue actively trading even after generating significant profits before they can withdraw. The evaluation fee is non-refundable regardless of outcome.

  • Outcome: The same swing trading strategy that generates fast payouts at Breakout creates payout timing friction at MyCryptoFunding due to the minimum trading day requirements.

  • Key lesson: Payout access timing can have a meaningful impact on a trader's cash flow and reinvestment cycle. Traders who value immediate access to earnings should factor minimum trading day requirements heavily into their firm selection.

Risks and what to watch out for

High leverage amplifies both gains and losses. At 100x, a 1% adverse move eliminates the full position. Even with MCF's dynamic reduction, traders who are accustomed to conservative leverage environments should paper-trade or size down significantly before relying on high leverage in an evaluation context.

Non-refundable fees mean failed evaluations carry a higher real cost at MCF. Model your expected pass rate honestly before comparing headline fee levels.

MCF is a newer firm. Registered in London in 2024, MyCryptoFunding has a shorter operating history than Breakout and a less established independent review record. Some payout delay reports exist in trader communities. That does not mean the firm is unreliable, but prospective traders have less third-party data to evaluate.

Minimum trading day requirements on funded accounts can force additional market exposure. Traders who generate profits quickly may need to continue trading for the sole purpose of meeting the 15-day minimum before requesting a payout.

Frequently asked questions

MyCryptoFunding has processed payouts since its launch in 2024 and offers USDT, BTC, and bank transfer options. However, some traders have reported payout delays in independent forums, and as a newer firm with a limited public review history, there is less third-party verification available compared to Breakout's 860+ Trustpilot reviews. Traders should verify current payout terms and review available independent feedback before committing.

MCF requires 5 minimum days traded on evaluation tests and 15 minimum trading days between each payout on funded accounts. This means even after hitting a profit target or generating significant gains, traders must continue actively trading before they can request a withdrawal. Breakout has no minimum trading day requirements at any stage.

Yes, but it requires strict position sizing discipline. At 100x leverage, a 1% adverse move on a full-size position wipes the entire position — and in crypto, 1% moves happen frequently even on BTC. Traders who use high leverage successfully in funded evaluations typically apply it to very small position sizes, effectively using the high leverage ceiling to fine-tune exposure rather than to maximise it. If you are new to high-leverage crypto trading, sizing down significantly from the maximum available is strongly advisable.

Start trading with Breakout

Breakout offers multiple 1-Step evaluations (with profit targets from 9% to 12%) and a 2-Step option, all with no consistency rules and no minimum trading day requirements. The 80% default profit split scales to 90% with an add-on, and payouts are available on-demand in USDC. Backed by Kraken following its September 2025 acquisition, Breakout brings institutional-grade infrastructure to crypto prop trading.

Breakout's evaluation program is intentionally rigorous and designed to verify a trader's risk-management skill and strategy discipline before any proprietary capital is allocated by Payward Oceanic Ltd. (POL). Most applicants do not pass on their first attempt and there is no guarantee that your performance will improve or that you will pass any future evaluations. Prospective traders should purchase an evaluation only if they are confident in their trading ability and knowingly accept the risk of not qualifying for a funded account. Evaluation fees are non-refundable for each attempt once trading begins, regardless of outcome. See breakoutprop.com for more disclosures. Not investment advice. Evaluation fees apply.